Justia Lawyer Rating
badge - California DUI Lawyers Association
badge - California Public Defenders Association
badge - Sacramento County Bar Association
badge - The State Bar of California
badge - United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Identified Informants

Identified Informants If you have been arrested for driving under the influence due to a tip to the police, you may be wondering how that affects your case. An experienced Sacramento DUI attorney may be able to answer your questions. In general, courts give significant leeway to tips by informants who identify themselves to the police. This is because informants who identify themselves are more likely to give truthful information. (There are civil and criminal penalties for informants who do not tell the truth.) The following cases illustrate this:

In one Missouri case, an eyewitness personally informed a police officer that he had seen a Jeep of a certain color driving erratically. The court found that the detention and arrest that came out of that tip was lawful. In a Kansas case, an informant identified her name and address to the police and passed along a description of a car. The court upheld the detention based on that tip because an informant who provides his or her name and address has a presumption of credibility. In one Arkansas case, a tipster gave his name to the police and said that he had observed some criminal activity, which was later confirmed by the police. The detention arising out of that tip was upheld. And in another Massachusetts case, a tip by a known citizen was deemed to be a reliable and sufficient justification for a stop.

Additionally, in a Florida case, an informant’s tip was deemed highly reliable due to the facts of the case. The informant was a manager at a fast food restaurant who dialed emergency services and reported what she thought to be a DUI driver. The informant gave her name, address, and current location to the 911 operator, as well as the vehicle’s license plate number and description. This tip was considered highly reliable.

There are cases where identification by an informant is not sufficient to justify a DUI stop. In a Utah case, a woman reported a nonviolent domestic dispute and that her boyfriend had been drinking and left the house, but this information was deemed insufficient to justify stopping the boyfriend on suspicion of DUI.

If you have further questions about the law regarding tipsters, contact experienced Sacramento DUI attorney Param Pabla for an initial consultation.

Client Reviews
“Mr. Pabla represented me with my DUI case. He has excellent communication skills and always kept me informed. Mr. Pabla made sure I understood the process and my rights. He eased my mind through a very stressful situation. I highly recommend Mr. Pabla.” Gurpreet
“I am so happy with the service that I received from Param S. Pabla. Jarrett did a great job solving my legal issue and I can’t recommend him enough! He was able to do everything quickly, painlessly, and was ALWAYS available to talk when I needed him. If I ever need help again, I will definitely use him!" Boris
“Param was excellent in my court case of failure to stop at a stop sign. The officer could not see clearly because he was too far away. The officer insisted he could and said he had video but could not produce it at the trial. The officer then asked if he could suspend the trial to go get the video but the judge said he should have had plenty of time to get the video ready beforehand. Needless to say, the judge ruled in my favor and dismissed the case which enraged the officer. Pabla Param’s defense and cross examination skills were excellent and paramount in having the case dismissed. Highly recommended.” T.C.
“My husband and I needed to update everything -family trust, will, medical stuff. Param was really patient -answering all my questions -even when I asked them twice. He wanted to be sure I understood everything we were doing. All docs were sent to us so we could go through them on our own time before anything was finalized. I also liked when we were looking at medical stuff that he had a conversation with me about what I wanted and pointed out some things I didn’t think of.” Debbie