Justia Lawyer Rating
badge - California DUI Lawyers Association
badge - California Public Defenders Association
badge - Sacramento County Bar Association
badge - The State Bar of California
badge - United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

How to Challenge the Voluntariness of a Confession

An experienced Sacramento DUI attorney should know how to challenge or suppress any confession made under unlawful circumstances.

Was the Confession Voluntary?

Confession Voluntary For the jury to hear the confession, a trial judge must determine whether your confession was made voluntarily.  A court hearing will decide if the confession is admissible at trial; however, prior to the hearing, your Sacramento DUI attorney must first make a motion pointing to facts that reveal the confession to be involuntary.

What actions your attorney must take will vary on the nature of claim. To suppress a confession based on a Miranda violation, only a motion or affidavit—stating that the defendant was arrested, that he was asked questions by the police, and that they did not provide the warnings—is necessary. Meanwhile, winning a true involuntariness claim requires the motion to specify the incidents that were tantamount to coercion.

Some courts will only accept allegations that come from an affidavit by a person with firsthand knowledge of the incident. This person is typically the defendant.

The Court Hearing

The hearing that will rule on the admissibility of the confession is best served by taking place before the trial, due to the following reasons:

  • The court ruling will potentially decide whether there will be a trial, plea or dismissal.
  • Your Sacramento DUI attorney must know if he has the option of questioning the potential juror about the confession during jury selection and exploring it during opening statements.
  • Finishing the hearing before the trial will spare the jury from committing unnecessary hours to address the situation at court.

Moreover, the hearing should be conducted without the jury, who should not hear the confession at that point. If jurors were to hear the confession, the harm inflicted would be irreversible, even if the judge may instruct them to disregard it.

Your Sacramento DUI attorney would rather win an involuntary confession claim than win a Miranda violation, since a prosecution cannot use coerced confession against you at trial, such as during cross-examination.

Even if you do not prevail in the involuntariness challenge, you can provide testimony regarding the circumstances in which the police coerced your confession to convince the jury that the confession should not be admitted. For example, an expert may testify that you tend to needlessly obey authority and heed even unproductive suggestions. He may also elaborate on the phenomenon of false confessions.

Contact Us

If you have been charged with a DUI and would like to consult a competent Sacramento DUI attorney, call Param Pabla at (916) 285-7900.

Client Reviews
“Mr. Pabla represented me with my DUI case. He has excellent communication skills and always kept me informed. Mr. Pabla made sure I understood the process and my rights. He eased my mind through a very stressful situation. I highly recommend Mr. Pabla.” Gurpreet
“I am so happy with the service that I received from Param S. Pabla. Jarrett did a great job solving my legal issue and I can’t recommend him enough! He was able to do everything quickly, painlessly, and was ALWAYS available to talk when I needed him. If I ever need help again, I will definitely use him!" Boris
“Param was excellent in my court case of failure to stop at a stop sign. The officer could not see clearly because he was too far away. The officer insisted he could and said he had video but could not produce it at the trial. The officer then asked if he could suspend the trial to go get the video but the judge said he should have had plenty of time to get the video ready beforehand. Needless to say, the judge ruled in my favor and dismissed the case which enraged the officer. Pabla Param’s defense and cross examination skills were excellent and paramount in having the case dismissed. Highly recommended.” T.C.
“My husband and I needed to update everything -family trust, will, medical stuff. Param was really patient -answering all my questions -even when I asked them twice. He wanted to be sure I understood everything we were doing. All docs were sent to us so we could go through them on our own time before anything was finalized. I also liked when we were looking at medical stuff that he had a conversation with me about what I wanted and pointed out some things I didn’t think of.” Debbie